# Change max\_proposal\_period parameter to 260

**URL:** <https://forum.namada.net/t/change-max-proposal-period-parameter-to-260/1643>\
**Category:** Proposal 🗳️\
**Created:** [4 April 2025 16:04 UTC](https://forum.namada.net/t/change-max-proposal-period-parameter-to-260/1643 "2025-04-04T16:04:28Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 6

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Gavin](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex017/user_avatar/forum.namada.net/gavin/32/16_2.png) [@Gavin](https://forum.namada.net/u/Gavin)\
**Post date:** [8 April 2025 14:30 UTC](https://forum.namada.net/t/change-max-proposal-period-parameter-to-260/1643/6 "2025-04-08T14:30:14Z")

</div>

agree! there’s a social commitment to increasing the minimum to 7.25 days in the Phase 5 proposal, which would be just about 5 days voting min for validators

> [@Mainnet parameter discussions: Knowable's proposal](https://forum.namada.net/t/mainnet-parameter-discussions-knowables-proposal/753/98):
>
> Thanks @brentstone! I think I can say that we (Knowable) are ready to proceed with these parameters. Noting that: max\_proposal\_code\_size (cc @Rigorous) turns out to be what we intended, being denominated in bytes in the code (but good catch, Rigorous! the docstring had mistakenly noted kb). Governance voting period would only be 3 day minimum voting at launch, which we think that should later increase to 7.25 days at the same time that transfers are enabled. Governance grace period would be 0…

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.namada.net/t/change-max-proposal-period-parameter-to-260/1643)._
