I think this is a nice idea, but unfortunately it isn’t trivial to implement in a privacy-preserving way, as far as I can see (and you don’t want to publicly reveal your NAM stake every time, as this would make your shielded transfers linkable) - so maybe a good idea to bookmark for the future.
1 Like
I’ll need to think about this but I can’t help but feel this might be useful in this context.
Appreciate your time 
I think it’s important to note that we need value capture somewhere - otherwise all the adoption in the world wont make Namada sustainable.
Railgun is 0.5% fees (0.25 in/out) so in terms of barriers for users we have an advantage there.
For MASP asset depositors, over time you’d expect the MASP rewards to surpass the fee - so it could even encourage more consistent liquidity.
Of course 0.1% may deter more users than 0% - but I’d expect users with a genuine need for privacy to be willing to pay a fee and we get the bonus of value capture.
1 Like
90% of the fees collected will be used to purchase Anoma’s initial tokens and distributed to the fee contributors. In the future, 90% of the fees collected will be used to purchase the initial tokens of other projects. I believe that many people will adopt NAM.