For the first point, I initially had the same reaction as you. However, I believe it’s more of a labeling issue. It’s more of a hackathon aimed at solving complex problems or introducing new products to Namada rather than a test favoring novice users. In this sense, the distribution is somewhat more relevant even though it’s challenging to grasp. Will highly rewarded individuals come to build on Namada?
For the second point, you are correct.