There were issues with gov voting also voting duration is 2 epochs but we were able to vote on 1 epoch only next epoch we got vp issues. We got this issue while voting with non-validator account. I think we got this issue during entire SE, you can check the issue related messages on discord se-100 group during the first week. Why if there were also bugs related with governance and not all participants could compete for the governance tasks, governance is kept unchanged? There are many reports also of people unable to vote when the faucet was not working for an extended period of time. Is it ethical to ignore all these issues for governance while addressing them for uptime?
The faucet still didn’t work, so Adrian started sending tokens himself. (After the validator had already passed the deadline to vote on dozens of proposals). I’m not sure exactly in how many proposals many validators missed the opportunity to vote on because Faucet wasn’t working.
@adrian 's response regarding missing the vote caused by faucet not working. I think there were about 30 proposals that were missed by validators who did not receive tokens due to faucet issues.
- The faucet did not work, so the validator could not vote on the proposal with a voting period of epoch3 to epoch4.
- adrian then manually send to tokens.
- In epoch 4, some validators received token and tried bonding as a non-validator account.
- Bonding takes place in the next epoch, so can vote starting from epoch5. In the end, neither validators nor non-validator account could vote on proposals whose voting deadline was epoch 4.
So these validators could vote on 90%+ of proposals, but 99%+ was not achievable.
Honestly these are much better reasons to remove governance, since for uptime there were ways to avoid getting jailed while for governance there was no way to get tokens to vote for many proposals.
