Hi, that’s an interesting suggestion.
I would still like to wait for tokenomics from the team to understand how to move forward.
But one thing bothers me.
I see in here direct contradiction of your proposal with the position of Chris @cwgoes and therefore the entire Heliax team.
Here ( Proposal for mainnet launch phases - #44 by cwgoes ) he writes:
" It may not be the case, for example, that Namada can support the costs of hundreds of validator operators - but far better for them to learn that now, than set up a whole operational setup on the basis of a distorted price signal and have much trouble in the future when that signal is corrected."
So I think the team is not interested in hundreds of Validators.
So I think this number should be reduced.
Or we need more clarification on this issue.