Hello!
It would be great to start identifying key metrics that would help make Namada easier to use, to set expectations, to identify key issues, to track our progress, and to make our successes visible
Here are some examples–grateful for folks to add to them
Trends
shielded transaction numbers (versus unshielded)
shielded token numbers and/or $ value (versus unshielded)
I think we should present and explain clearly what are the use cases of Namada and who would be the users for each use case. Then, there has to be very strong tailored marketing of each use case to each target group in order for Namada to have a lot of users
I second you on this. I was reading Gavin’s post and began thinking about the value on Namada per shielded asset. This combined with the inflows/outflows of each asset kind of gives you an idea of shield health, shielded power level if you will. Perhaps that could be an extension of the Namadillo Interface, made visible within a subsection. It might even be as important to put it on the home page main page as an HUD. Thoughts?