Hi @Daniel
Shielded Live has a history of being a very useful service, with advanced features at an early stage. However, there’s also a history of Shielded Live misreporting data, which can confuse Namada users and other stakeholders who count on this service.
I mentioned this once in December. On March 4 I asked if you could signal the state of Shielded Live’s service to users, since the service had been misreporting for a few weeks. It’s Mar 28 and there’s still nothing to indicate that to the user.
Accuracy and reliability should be table stakes for a service to be noteworthy, and Shielded Live has not demonstrated either for a concerning amount of time, without informing users.
The amount that we are requesting for voters is focused on retroactive recognition of the Shielded Live service primarily during the period prior to mainnet launch.